Re: [gnome-network]gnome-network download manager
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Manuel Clos <llanero eresmas net>
- Cc: gnome-network-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-network]gnome-network download manager
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:47:07 +0200
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 22:41, Manuel Clos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying again since last time I didn't got response about it.
>
> Has people looked at downman and considered it for inclusion in
> gnome-network? If so, what are the problems?
>
> Downman is already working, so making it the base of gnome-network
> download manager will mean that there will be a lot of time to implement
> missing and desired features and stabilization.
>
> Downman consists of:
> - downmand: a daemon that takes care of downloading the files
>
how is it activated?
> - gdownman: the Gnome 2 GUI that lets you browse downloads, add, start,
> stop, delete, ...
> - downman-gmonitor: a simple basket window where you can drop urls from
> the browsers
> - downman: a simple command line utility to add downloads
> - downman-bonobo: it is in the works and will allow for other programs
> to use downman trough a simple bonobo interface
>
the one you sent?
In this, I see the problem of not having the libgnetwork bit, which is
one of my priorities.
> Downman already can:
> - download from HTTP and FTP. But this is to change after moving to
> gnome-vfs
>
good
> - basic things like adding a download, starting, _queuing_, stopping,
> delete...
> - limit speed of the downloads
> - create different lists of downloads (projects) each with a different
> target directory and properties
> - limit the simultaneous downloads on a project
> - limit speed of a project
> - do recursive downloads
> - limit the number of connections to a server
>
> I can't remember more right now, well, it also features a nice Gnome 2
> GUI with progressbars and mime type icons :)
>
is all this easily available in a form that can be moved to its own
place and start being a library?
> I don't see why people want to reimplement this from scratch.
>
well, we dont want to implement it from scratch. I think its clear we
want a good architecture for this transfer stuff.
Yes, transfer, which I dont know if its taken into account in downman.
That is, is it "hard-coded" for downloads-only?
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]