Re: [gnome-mud] #116325



On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:01:32AM +0200, Robin Ericsson wrote:
> Would this be a good fix for bug #116325 or should I do something more
> fancy like only flush on every 10th log or something?

> --- window.c	2 Apr 2003 08:39:32 -0000	1.31
> +++ window.c	30 Sep 2003 06:59:27 -0000
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ void textfield_add (CONNECTION_DATA *cd,
>  		&& colortype != MESSAGE_SYSTEM)
>  	{
>  		fputs(message, connections[i]->log);
> +		fflush(connectios[i]->log);
>  	}
>  
>  	switch (colortype)

Wouldn't this be too much flushing? I'm just asking, not questioning the
change :)

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer     http://www.debian.org/
jordi sindominio net     jordi debian org     http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]