Re: Moving to pointer-sized GType?
- From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: <gnome-hackers gnome org>, <gnome-list gnome org>, <timj gtk org>
- Subject: Re: Moving to pointer-sized GType?
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
On 14 Sep 2001, Dan Winship wrote:
> > The change will be fully source compatible for code that correctly uses
> > GType, but unfortunately there are some places in our codebases that use
> > uint instead of GType/GtkType to store/handle types, and these will break
> > on 64bit architectures (warning + segfault), but silently work on 32bit
> > architectures.
> Adding more ways for the teeming 32bit-only hordes to unwittingly break
> things for 64bit architectures seems bad. Couldn't you just make GType
> be a gpointer and use GPOINTER_TO_UINT or whatever in the few places
> where you want to think of them as integers? (Which would only be inside
> the type system itself, right?)
This breaks the concept of constant value fundamental types and the
ability to switch on GType.
] [Thread Prev