Re: The future of gnome-pim - and Balsa, too?
- From: Loban Amaan Rahman <loban earthling net>
- To: Toralf Lund <toralf kscanners com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The future of gnome-pim - and Balsa, too?
- Date: 15 Aug 2001 11:49:46 -0700
> > I think that you're a bit confused as to how Evolution actually works...
>
> No. I think I understand it fairly well, but that's not the issue. I choose
> to regard Evolution it as ONE application simply because that's the way it
> looks from a user's viewpoint. All my arguments are based on that.
>
> My complaint is really that you have spoilt a lot of great work by wrapping
> it up the wrong way, nothing else.
So are you saying that bonobo is the wrong way to go? Cause that is
pretty much how I view it has been wrapped up. Granted, evolution does
start up all components on starting, which has overhead. I filed a bug
suggesting it only loads the last used component on startup, and load
the rest on demand, or have a checklist of which to load at first. This
bug has been marked post-1.0 though.
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Loban Amaan Rahman <-- anagram of --> Aha! An Abnormal Man! |
| loban earthling net, loban ugcs caltech edu, http://i.am/loban |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]