Re: Problems with libunicode 0.4 (was Re: gnome-print problem)

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, John Gotts wrote:
> In message <20000912012405 B8407 aucegypt edu>, Ali Abdin writes:
> >* Iain (tigermilk btinternet com) wrote at 01:21 on 11/09/00:
> >> > Well maybe that is the problem. is there more that one version?
> >> About 3.
> >> The one you want is the gnome CVS one.
> >> I dunno if it has a webpage.
> >I had 'issues' with the gnome CVS one :) 
> I've put my patch against 0.4 (which is based upon the CVS tree, but does not
> contain any source code changes) online:
> The gist of the patch is an updated toplevel,,
>, and, but my patch also updates libtool,
> autoconf, etc. in the process, so it's a bit large.  Somebody should release
> 0.4a with this patch.

I think some people are opposed to such a release because basically the 
libunicode library is deprecated for the 2.0 platform - Some people are 
opposed to making libunicode a dependancy in the GNOME 1.4 platform, only 
to remove it for GNOME 2.0

SOme people are suggesting using th Glib unicode stuff (in a seperate 
library) for GNOME 1.4 - Havoc would be a better person to ask on this 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]