Re: RPM problems - undefined symbols

[Brian Ryner <bryner uiuc edu>]

In that case, they could at least indicate this in the Requires: line in
the spec file, so the RPM won't install if it won't work correctly.

bob@kehs.ksd.org wrote:
> 
> someone keeps building the gnome rpms off of glibc 2.1 instead of the
> standard redhat 2.0 so when you are trying to compile, it dosnt work
> out... get glibc 2.1 or recompile all of gnome...
>