Re: Updated gnome-* RPMs
- From: "Hall Stevenson" <dhs erinet com>
- To: "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>, <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Updated gnome-* RPMs
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 11:40:23 -0500
Correct, it does have the updated glibc package(s). I have no problem using
them, unless there will be other "problems" with it. ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Fox, Kevin M <KMFox@mail.bhi-erc.com>
To: 'Hall Stevenson' <dhs@erinet.com>; gnome-list@gnome.org
<gnome-list@gnome.org>
Date: Friday, March 19, 1999 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: Updated gnome-* RPMs
>Starbuck uses 2.1, you should be able to find a 2.1 rpm in the starbuck rpm
>directory...
>
>As to breaking anything, I dont know....
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hall Stevenson [SMTP:dhs@erinet.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 8:28 AM
>> To: gnome-list@gnome.org
>> Subject: Re: Updated gnome-* RPMs
<snip>
>> Now when trying to upgrade them, they complain about GLIBC2.1 !!!
>>
>> I got them from a RedHat "starbuck" mirror... Is that the problem? Do the
>> RPMs at the gnome mirrors require the newer glibc libraries ? If so, I
>> have
>> no problem updating my glibc packages, so long as it breaks nothing else.
<snip>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]