RE: gnotes+ editor strangeness

["Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>]

That worked. But by tradition should it be

"gnp &" for forking and "gnp" for not...
It is not a big issue but it makes gnp a non standard app. (is there a
reason that it should break tradition?)

PS. Thanks for the great text editor

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Andy Kahn [SMTP:kahn@zk3.dec.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, March 18, 1999 12:13 PM
> To:	Fox, Kevin M
> Cc:	gnome-list@gnome.org
> Subject:	Re: gnotes+ editor strangeness
> 
> On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 11:33:45AM -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> > I really like gnp+ but I cant use it in scripts.
> > Gnp+ spawns off a copy of itself on startup. Could it follow the
> standard
> > rule of not doing that please. That way it can be used in shell scripts.
> > 
> 
> try :  gnp --nofork
> 
> hope this helps,
> --andy