Re[2]: new development!!$$%%^^&&

     I think from memory that enlightenment does actually ask for 
     permission before adding lines to .xinitrc so not like windows at all 

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: new development!!$$%%^^&& 
Author:  < > at INTERNET-MAIL
Date:    11/03/99 19:30

On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Maurice Hilarius wrote:
> OK, with the kind help of many on this list I _*HAD*_ my Gnome startting up 
> fine.
> The last problem was where Enlightnement decided to add a line to my 
> .xinitrc to start it _before_ Gnome, so of course it failed.
Is Enlightenment still doing that? I find that so windowish annoying.
        FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at
         To unsubscribe: mail with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Received: from by (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.10.00)
	; Thu, 11 Mar 99 19:18:15 GMT
Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 7872 invoked by uid 501); 11 Mar 1999 19:30:05 -0000
Resent-Date: 11 Mar 1999 19:30:05 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
MBOX-Line: From  Thu Mar 11 14:30:04 1999
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:23:48 +0100
From: Ronald de Man <>
Subject: Re: new development!!$$%%^^&&
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To: <>; from Maurice Hilarius on Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 10:33:27AM -0700
X-Operating-System: Linux localhost 2.2.3 
Resent-Message-ID: <"_2VNC2.0.iw1.yc1ws">
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/10617
X-just-a-test: testing
Precedence: list

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]