Re: Control Center/Enlightenment configuration
- From: "Tim Lewis" <tlewis digaudio com>
- To: <raster redhat com>, <jsight pair com>
- Cc: <rms39 columbia edu>, <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Control Center/Enlightenment configuration
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 15:00:39 -0800
I might add to this that E and GNOME must be able to set backgrounds
independently, since one cannot assume E is in use with GNOME.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: raster@redhat.com <raster@redhat.com>
To: jsight@pair.com <jsight@pair.com>
Cc: rms39@columbia.edu <rms39@columbia.edu>; gnome-list@gnome.org
<gnome-list@gnome.org>
Date: Monday, February 22, 1999 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: Control Center/Enlightenment configuration
>On 22 Feb, Jesse D. Sightler scribbled:
>-> raster@redhat.com wrote:
>-> >
>-> > On 22 Feb, Russell Steinthal scribbled:
>-> > -> I just came across a somewhat weird E/GNOME interaction which I
>-> > -> thought I'd mention (I'm writing here since I don't read the E
list
>-> > -> and I know Rasterman is on gnome-list...). Anyway, enough
>-> > -> introduction.
>-> > ->
>-> > -> Basically, the problem is that if I start the GNOME Control
Center
>-> > -> and go to the Enlightenment page, the Backgrounds (sub-) page is
>-> > -> inactive (i.e. all the controls except OK and Cancel are grayed
out).
>-> > -> If I run the Enlightenment configurator from my E menu (middle
>-> > -> button, Configuration), it works correctly.
>-> > ->
>-> > -> Is this a known problem, a feature I just missed the
documentation
>-> > -> for, a misconfiguration on my part, or a new bug? If the latter,
and
>-> > -> I can provide any more information, let me know.
>-> >
>-> > its a feature. (in special fx when you run under the control-center
>-> > theyers a checkbutton to enable the background selector)
>-> >
>->
>-> Why has this never been added to the Backgrounds page? Seriously, I'm
>-> no UI expert, but don't you think that it would be more intuitive if
the
>-> option to enable backgrounds were on the same page as the background
>-> settings? :)
>
>it's not MEANt to be intuitive - its meant to hide it from the novice
>user.
>
>--
>--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I
am" --------------------
>raster@rasterman.com /\___ /\ ___/||\___ ____/|/\___
raster@redhat.com
>Carsten Haitzler | _ //__\\ __||_ __\\ ___|| _ / Red Hat
Advanced
>218/21 Conner Drive || // __ \\_ \ | | \ _/_|| / Development
Labs
>Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA ||\\\/ \//__/ |_| /___/||\\ 919 547 0012
ext 282
>+1 (919) 929 9443, 801 4392 For pure Enlightenment
http://www.rasterman.com/
>
> \|/ ____ \|/ For those of you unaware. This face here is in
fact
> "@'/ ,. \@" a Linux Kernel Error Message.
> /_| \__/ |_\
> \__U_/
>
>
>
>--
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]