Re: GNOME vs KDE
- From: "Mark R. Bowyer" <Moredhel earthling net>
- To: nodatadj webtribe net, david ritter demon co uk
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME vs KDE
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 09:58:36 +0100 (BST)
Agreed - they didn't do much if any research, they just installed and ran and
listed what they couldn't do. Yes this is what a newbie would do, but that was
supposed to be an authoriative review =OZ
Mind you, in the same issue we have a review of Wine as a means of seeing how
Windows code works and possibly - and I paraphrase - turn the freely available
code into Delphi widgets and sell them for a mint =OZ Plus, in the Advanced
Linux how-to section, they discuss ip-chains. And they show the HTML docs for
this inside IE5.0 =OZ
Not exactly leading you to trust their knowledge, is it?
-------My opinion - Not sane, intelligent or necessarily useful-------
o o mailto:Moredhel@earthling.net
/v\ark R. Bowyer. http://i.am/Moredhel mailto:Mark.Bowyer@UK.Sun.COM
`-' "Everything is true, for a given value of 'true'" - PTerry
>Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:11:09 +0100
>From: David Knight <email@example.com>
>To: Iain <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>CC: gnome mailing list <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: GNOME vs KDE
>> PC Plus (issue 155) has a GNOME vs KDE article.
>> I can type it up if anyone wants to see it, but the quick verdict is
>I actually found the article of poor quality and have prepared a response to
>it (admitedly I'm no expert at writing so its a bit pathetic) I plan to mail
>them the url to see if I can get the link in the magazine.
>For anyone that wants to read an early version:
>The superior man understands what is right;
>the inferior man understands what will sell.
> -- Confucius
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail firstname.lastname@example.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
] [Thread Prev