Re: Questions regarding Control-Center.
- From: "J. Patrick Narkinsky" <patrick narkinsky ml org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- cc: Jens Lautenbacher <jens tellux de>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questions regarding Control-Center.
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:18:02 -0400 (EDT)
On 25 Sep 1998, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Consider what happens when you bring up a capplet, make changes in it,
> and then switch to another capplet, before applying your
> changes. Using notebook tabs for active capplets is an attempt to
> solve a UI flaw in KDE's control panel where unapplied changes can
> easily be lost.
>
> Perhaps your objection would be addressed if there was an option such
> that switching away from a capplet with no unapplied changes caused
> that capplet to be closed or hidden. We discussed doing that, but
> decided against making that the default because having notebooks close
> themselves sometimes, but not others probably would be confusing to
> novice users. It could easily be an option in the Preferences.
> (Or could be made the default if it was shown not to be confusing
> in reality)
>
It seems to me that the best approach would be this: when a capplet is
closed, have it pop up a dialog "This action will lose your changes. Save
changes now?".
I haven't looked at the details of how it would work, but I think that's
the correct thing to do from a UI perspective. I certainly think that
having a 'hidden' capplet open behind the scenes would be a Bad Idea.
Incidentally: do you visualize capplets for non-UI configuration changes?
I.e. a "setup DNS" capplet? Sorry if this is documented somewhere and I
just haven't found it.
Patrick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we're to have any luck stanching the vain drain, we just have to
let nerds be nerds... Owen Edwards, Forbes Magazine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]