Re: Relocatability of packages
- From: Tim Moore <tmoore tembel org>
- To: Scott Gifford <sgifford tir com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Relocatability of packages
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 19:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Scott Gifford wrote:
> >So does that mean you have to put every *.app directory (which may be
> >scattered around the system) in your path? Wouldn't building menus for the
> >GNOMEprint and whatever be a big headache? And what about the separation
> >of system-independent vs. system-dependent data?
>
>
> You could just symlink the parts a user would want to run into
> /usr/local/bin, or some other directory like /usr/local/apps...
>
I was under the impression that the idea was to be able to move stuff
around at will, so symlinks would break. And why is it better to symlink
/usr/local/bin/foo to <some-random-prefix>/foo.app/foo than to just
install foo into /user/local/bin in the first place? And that doesn't
address the system-dependent vs. system-independent data problem.
Tim
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]