Re: Why are GNOME RPMs non-relocatable?

[Tim Moore <tmoore tembel org>]

Tim Moore wrote:
> 
> There's a comment at the beginning of all of the RPM spec files saying
> that the packages aren't relocatable. Why is this? They all use prefix,
> the prefix is passed to configure, and I know that people have been able
> to relocate tarball installations by using the prefix flag on configure.
> So what makes the RPMs nonrelocatable? Or is that comment in error?

Nevermind. I hate when this happens, but I realize why this question was
stupid now.

Sorry,
Tim