Re: Qt becomes Free Software




    >> 1.  The complaint has been about the QT license and KDE. That
    >>     is definately solved.

    luther> still it is not DFSG free, but then i think it would be ok
    luther> to put it into non-free. ...

Wait a second: I thought that the DFSG and the Open Source definition
were the same.  I thought that "open source" meant "satisfies the
DFSGs".  At least it was so in the original announcement of "open
source" terminology.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]