RE: GWP and 'the foot'
- From: "Braden N. McDaniel" <braden shadow net>
- To: "J. Patrick Narkinsky" <patrick narkinsky ml org>, <gnome-list gnome org>
- Cc: <gnome-gui-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: GWP and 'the foot'
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 05:33:24 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Patrick Narkinsky [mailto:patrick@narkinsky.ml.org]
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 1998 12:53 AM
> To: gnome-list@gnome.org
> Cc: gnome-gui-list@gnome.org
> Subject: GWP and 'the foot'
>
>
> I just had the opportunity to check out the latest sources for GWP from
> CVS -- first off, for those of you who haven't taken a look lately, do so.
> These guys have been coding like crazy.
>
> One thing that they did which I REALLY like is they put a Macintosh-like
> 'gnome foot' icon on the left-most side of their menubar with some common
> utility functions under it.
>
> For example, this menu in GWP has:
> About...
> Preferences...
> ----
> Quit
>
> I REALLY like this as an UI idea.
So do I, but might it be better to use the application icon rather than the
G?
> First, it clears up a lot of the
> ambiguity about what to do with the "File" menu in applications where it
> is not appropriate (e.g. games).
Cooper makes a good point on this issue in _The Essentials of User Interface
Design_. "File" is awfully generic. In fact, the notion of a "file" is
really an implementation thing. For most applications (a notable exception
being a file manager), one could think of a more appropriate name for the
menu generally dubbed "File". In a word processor, for example, "Document"
would be more appropriate.
Braden
<http://www.endoframe.com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]