Re: I think we should have a Gnome Window Manager

[<nuke bayside net>]

On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Mark Galassi wrote:

> 
> Guys, it's already been discussed enough, and I think that Marcus
> would not object to what our consensus is:
> 
> We will provide patches to make two or three popular WMs work well
> with GNOME, thus adding some heightened awareness for those who can
> handle those two or three WMs.  But we will not require any given
> window manager.
> 
> Marcus should be satisfied with this because it means that one or two
> WMs will play the role he just proposed (of being a small,
> configurable, tightly integrated WM).

have we made any suggestions as to which ones to make gnome-able? i
personally nominate Fvwm[2], Afterstep, and Windowmaker. Enlightenment
will already follow all gnomeness, so we can focus on some other less
popular ones as well
 _        _  __     __             _ _                                  _
|        / |/ /_ __/ /_____         |       Nuke Skyjumper               |
|       /    / // /  '_/ -_)        |         "Master of the Farce"      |
|_     /_/|_/\_,_/_/\_\\__/        _|_           nuke@bayside.net       _|