Re: Don't waste time on offline newsreaders...
- From: Gianluca Montecchi <gm518464 silab dsi unimi it>
- To: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman boxster law miami edu>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Don't waste time on offline newsreaders...
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:55:01 +0100 (MET)
On 9 Feb 1998, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Gianluca Montecchi <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > True. But perhaps (in my opinion) write a front-end for this (or for
> > skim etc. etc.) is a good idea. I prefer a single program to read
> > the mail, a program to read the news and so on. Another idea can be
> > to have a single program with two or more window to read the news,
> > read the mail, etc.
> But that model gains you *nothing*, and has two easy-to-discern costs:
> 2) It's not an efficient use of net resources for the same reason
> Netscape's cache is when compared to squid---it means each person
> using a machine must downloading a copy of gnu.emacs.bugs instead of
> using a shared cached copy. Disks are cheap, but bandwidth rarely is.
I use the net only when I must download the articles and post my articles.
I am not always on line. If it is true that disks are cheap (and this is
true) it is better to waste disk-space.
You don't take care of the dial-up lines. I agree that we cannot take care
only this, we must take care also this.
What I want is a newsreader that it is usable also with a dial-up
connection. I don't want to pay a expensive phone bill, so for me (or
other) is better the offline reader.
Member of the Pluto Linux Users Group
Avaible e-mail address:
email@example.com (-) firstname.lastname@example.org
Web page: http://www.silab.dsi.unimi.it/~gm518464
For Linux questions please mail to email@example.com
] [Thread Prev