RE: UI Rantings [was: Re: gmc and file-selection mockups]
- From: Rowan van der Molen <bigsmoke usa net>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: UI Rantings [was: Re: gmc and file-selection mockups]
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:09:08 +0100
At 09:57 30-12-98 -0800, you wrote:
>I was under the impression that gtk themes uses modules. The engines are
>modules. Since each user can choose which theme they want, the same could
>apply for the dialogs. Maby the dialogs should be part of gtk themes as
>well.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Burrows [SMTP:Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 1998 9:56 AM
>> To: 'gnome-list@gnome.org'
>> Subject: Re: UI Rantings [was: Re: gmc and file-selection mockups]
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 08:19:18AM -0800, Fox, Kevin M was heard to say:
>> > You could modularize the open dialog code. Then if anyone wants
>> something
>> > different, they could just replace the module. That seems to be the
>> easiest
>> > solution.
>> >
>>
>> Hmm, what happens if two users on the same computer want different
>> dialogs?
>> Sounds too much like the Athena widget setup to me.. I think that it
>> should
>> either be a CORBA object or (is this possible?) in a .lo file (a la
>> themes)
>>
CORBA would be the most flexible
>> --
>> Daniel Burrows
>>
>> Nothing is hopeless.
>>
>> PROOF:
>> (a) Assume the opposite.
>> (b) If something _is_ hopeless, then its condition can only improve.
>> (c) If its condition can only improve, then there must be hope for it.
>> (d) Therefore, nothing is hopeless. QED.
>>
>>
>> --
>> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
>> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
>--
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]