Re: CVS doesn't like its own checkouts???
- From: Daniel Burrows <Daniel_Burrows brown edu>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: CVS doesn't like its own checkouts???
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 17:24:42 -0500
On Sat, Dec 19, 1998 at 01:58:24PM -0800, Jonathan Sergent scribbled:
> In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.981219083944.7937B-100000@spootown>, Gleef writes:
> ] It's been happening since long before GNOME_STABLE has been a tag, but so
> ] far my commands pretty much match yours. I only see it during a checkout
> ] of an existing module, but as included modules come and go, one has to
> ] recheckout regularly to catch the new modules.
>
> That's just the thing. Don't checkout existing modules; update them.
>
From the CVS manpage:
Running `cvs checkout' on a directory that was already built by a prior
checkout is also permitted, and has the same effect as specifying the -d
option to the update command described below.
Is this wrong, or should we not be using the -d tag? The manpage says
about it:
Use the -d option to create any directories that
exist in the repository if they're missing from the
working directory. (Normally, update acts only on
directories and files that were already enrolled in
your working directory.) This is useful for updating
directories that were created in the repository since
the initial checkout; but it has an unfortunate side
effect. If you deliberately avoided certain directo
ries in the repository when you created your working
directory (either through use of a module name or by
listing explicitly the files and directories you
wanted on the command line), then updating with -d
will create those directories, which may not be what
you want.
--
Daniel Burrows
Things are not as bad as they seem.
PROOF:
(a) Assume the opposite
(b) If things really are as bad as they seem, then they cannot get any worse
(c) If things cannot get any worse, then that is something good about them
(d) Therefore, things are not as bad as they seem. QED
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]