Icons of program
- From: tom mystery antar com (tom)
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Icons of program
- Date: 20 Apr 98 22:00:19 +0100
Dwight Hubbard wrote:
DH> Rename your resource fork as filename.info and you essentially have and
DH> Amiga
DH> .info file. It might be better to name it .uid.info for a multiuser
DH> environment though.
both will break shell-completion mechanisms. they will also have unwanted side-
effects on almost every command using wildcards, like "xv *" to view all the
pixmaps in the current dir.
DH> I still think this is the best solution,
DH> centralized
DH> solutions be they registries or centralized directories tend to loose
DH> all the
i think a registry-lookalike isn't even worth talking about. the windoze one is
a bad design badly implemented, but even a good implementation wouldn't save
it.
DH> fork. It also has the benifit of having both the program and it's icon
DH> resources in the same place which makes them easier to move with current
DH> tools. I.E. "mv /footerm* /mnt/floppy" will copy footerm and it's icon
DH> to
DH> the floppy.
however, "mv *.html /usr/local/whatever" will break everything.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]