Re: extended zvt widget
- From: Cristiano De Michele <demichel na infn it>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: GNOME devel <gnome-devel-list gnome org>, libs devel GNOME <gnome-libs-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: extended zvt widget
- Date: 30 Apr 2002 17:57:28 +0200
Hi,
I gave a quick look at zvt accessibility sources and
there shouldn't anything broken though we need to check
of course, anyway the only problem I saw is that
I extended the line zvt struct adding for each char a unsigned
char to put extra attributes such as that related to SPA/DEC
protected modes,
in fact zvt_term_get_buffer works exactly in the same way...
Cristiano
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 17:35, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 14:41, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 16:29, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 23:27, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> ...>
>
> > > However Cristiano, did you notice the accessibility
> > > code in libzvt when you were working on it, and did you check to see if
> > > it still worked after your changes? That's something that would need to
> > > be confirmed before applying any changes to libzvt.
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > >
> > > -Bill
> > Hi Bill,
> > I used profterm with my patched applied without any problem and
> > I also run vttest inside profterm having no problem,
> > should I do anything specific to test accessibility with my patches?
>
> Hi Cristiano:
>
> Yes, those two tests will tell you nothing at all about the
> accessibility support. If you test with ferret (from cvs module gail)
> and simple-at (from at-spi) that will give you some information. Ferret
> is probably the easier of the two tests to set up and run, though its
> coverage is rather limited.
> in csh:
>
> setenv GTK_MODULES gail:ferret
>
> run the terminal window with the "Text" tab frontmost in the ferret
> window, and check for inconsistencies.
>
> Actually testing the libzvt accessibility coverage thoroughly is not a
> trivial task, but ferret will give you some feedback and of course you
> could patch ferret to give better coverage of the AtkText interfaces as
> needed for libzvt.
>
> You might glance at the code for accessibility support in libzvt (the
> code that does things like implement atk_text_get_text_at_offset, etc.)
> and also make sure you haven't changed the behavior of internal zvt
> signal which the accessibility support relies on. I think it's likely
> that any substantial changes in libzvt (which it sounds as if you have
> done) would break at least some of the accessibility support. At this
> late date no one should be changing code that accessibility uses without
> trying to test it.
>
> I recognize that the available test tools for accessibility may make it
> hard to do these regression tests at the moment, please feel free to
> help in that regard :-)
>
> best regards,
>
> Bill
>
> > ...I could give you some more infos on my patches of course
> > but split them in separate bugs it's not feasible and even
> > meaningless IMHO what's your opinio about? what should I do?
> >
> > regards Cristiano
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cristiano De Michele,
> > Department of Physics,
> > University "Federico II" of Naples
> >
>
>
--
Cristiano De Michele,
Department of Physics,
University "Federico II" of Naples
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]