Re: Food for thought: Why (and how) should KDE and Gnome unite?
- From: Sirtaj Singh Kang <ssk physics unimelb edu au>
- To: Tero Pulkkinen <terop students cc tut fi>
- cc: gnome-kde-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Food for thought: Why (and how) should KDE and Gnome unite?
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:09:50 +1100 (EST)
On 23 Dec 1998, Tero Pulkkinen wrote:
[snip]
> 1) Set of libraries must be introduced that are independent of the
> other Gnome or KDE things, especially widget sets. These libraries
> must have corba interface, so that our existing common ground (IIOP)
> can be utilized -- access outside corba interfaces to these libraries
> is banned.
You're not asking much, are you? ;) Luckily, Torben also believes in the
joys of toolkit independence, so a lot of his new CORBA-intensive code
(kom, op, kfmIII and a lot of the koffice stuff) uses STL only (no Qt
containers).
I'm not sure about much else, though. STL is still a pain on many
platforms where the Qt containers work just fine, so the incentive to
switch everything to STL is still quite low. But that could change.
-Taj.
Sirtaj S. Kang taj@kde.org ssk@physics.unimelb.edu.au
School of Physics Univ of Melbourne KDE: The Desktop sans Toga
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]