Re: release notes: first draft
- From: "Luis Villa" <luis villa gmail com>
- To: "James Henstridge" <james jamesh id au>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Edward Hervey <bilboed gmail com>, Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au>, GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>, marketing-list gnome org, Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Subject: Re: release notes: first draft
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:06:01 -0500
On 3/7/06, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au> wrote:
> Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> > revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
> >
> > "Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
> >patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
> >offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
> >available."
> >
> > Does that make more clear the *freedom of choice* offered to users ?
> >
> >
> Apart from the freedom issue (which is important), is this actually a
> new feature for Gnome 2.14? GStreamer 0.8 also used plugins, so surely
> codec vendors had the same ability to offer plugins back then as with 0.10.
>
> Has anything actually changed here other than a vendor (Fluendo) making
> use of this ability? If not, then this probably isn't appropriate for
> the release notes.
This issue has been a big, ongoing issue for the linux desktop for
years. It certainly seems appropriate to talk about the results now
that our long-term strategic choices have blossomed.
Luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]