Re: ggv has been branched
- From: Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>
- To: Gary Ekker <gekker novell com>
- Cc: GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: ggv has been branched
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:40:17 +0200
tis 2005-06-07 klockan 18:50 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker:
> > I'm afraid the current branch name will be very confusing to many
> > contributors, not at least translators, who work with many modules at
> > the same time and rely on branches being named consistently.
>
> Understood.
>
>
> > The policy (http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/for_maintainers.html) is
> > that the branch name should indicate the stable GNOME release the branch
> > is targeted at, which means the *latest* stable GNOME release the branch
> > is targeted at, if it is supposed to cover many stable releases.
> > Noone will never ever (hopefully) release a new version of GNOME 2.8,
> > however naming a new branch "gnome-2-8" implies that you're working
> > towards such a release, which I'm sure isn't the case. However, the
> > branch name still indicates that.
> >
> > So yes, if you could find a way to create a stable branch with the
> > standard name "gnome-2-10", it would be *much* appreciated.
>
> There is now also a gnome-2-10 branch which will be used for the next
> stable release, should the need arise.
Thanks, Gary. The translation status pages for GNOME 2.10 have now been
updated to show the new ggv gnome-2-10 branch.
Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]