Re: "Folder" or "directory"? Standardization?
- From: Åsmund Skjæveland <aasmunds fys uio no>
- To: GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: "Folder" or "directory"? Standardization?
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:19:01 +0100
Sorry, pressed the wrong key. Trying again.
> > Some packages use the word "folder", some the word "directory", and some
> > use both. Is there an official GNOME name for this type of file, or is
> > it up to the developers? If there is no such standard name, one should
>
> Please consult
> http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/x10997.html on the use of
> both words.
I quote:
directory
Definition:
A special type of file that enables you to organize other files
into a hierarchical structure. Only use the term directory when
you make specific references to the structure of the file
system.
Example:
The New Folder menu item creates a new folder on your desktop.
This folder is located in the directory /.nautilus/desktop
folder
Definition:
A representation of a directory in a graphical application. Use
the term folder when you document applications that use folder
icons to represent directories.
Example:
To create a folder, choose File->New Folder.
I can't see why one should use different terms here. It's just
confusing. Particularly the phrase "This folder is located in the
directory..." illustrates this. Why are my files in directories when I
use command-line tools or a file manager that doesn't use folder icons,
but in folders when I use the standard views in Nautilus? If my folder
is in a directory, why don't I see a folder when I use "ls"? What if I
change my icons? I still think it'd be better to choose one word over
the other.
--
Åsmund Skjæveland <aasmunds@fys.uio.no>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]