[Bug 115177] Changed - Even more string issues



Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115177

Changed by aguelzow@taliesin.ca.

--- shadow/115177	Sun Jun 15 15:38:52 2003
+++ shadow/115177.tmp.10448	Sun Jun 15 15:47:06 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 115177
 Product: Gnumeric
 Version: CVS
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: rh9
-Status: REOPENED   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: minor
 Priority: Normal
 Component: General
 AssignedTo: jody@gnome.org                            
 ReportedBy: jan.moren@lucs.lu.se               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -280,6 +280,10 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From aguelzow@taliesin.ca  2003-06-15 15:38 -------
 Regarding the latter remaining issue: you can have known_x's without 
 new_x's. I believe we used the notation [...] rather than [...[...]] 
 to mean that they are individually optional.
 
 I will need to check that.
+
+------- Additional Comments From aguelzow@taliesin.ca  2003-06-15 15:47 -------
+I was mistaken. I have changed the function prototype and ajusted the 
+`meean'.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]