El mié, 31-12-2003 a las 13:11, Ole Laursen escribió: > Görkem Çetin <gorkem@bahcesehir.edu.tr> writes: > > > While checking out > > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gtp/status/gnome-2.6/tr/extras/index.html, > > I was puzzled that 'module' and 'path' fields are almost identical. > > > > Is 'path' field really necessary? I'm using a 1024x768 screen > > resolution and Mozilla cannot render the whole page - I have to use > > the slider bar to see the graph located on the very right hand side. > > If this path field is omitted, than there's a very high probability > > that the page fits on a standard 1024x768 monitor. > > There's already a bug in bugzilla.gnome.org about it which I filed. I > think Carlos is going to/has already fixed it for the next revamp of > the status pages. But I guess he has had too much else to do lately to > work on that revamp. The "revamp" is done with 1024x768 resolution in mind, you can see it at http://carlos.pemas.net/GNOME/l10n/ I'm working on it, but it's not my priority now. Until the GNOME 2.6 freeze date I'm trying to improve GNOME, when we start the freeze period, I will focus all my energies to finish status pages. Cheers. -- Carlos Perelló Marín Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmadadigitalmente