Re: Translation issues with strftime



On 2003-12-03(Wed) 00:17:13 +1100, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> >        By  default, date pads numeric fields with zeroes.  GNU date recognizes
> >        the following modifiers between `%' and a numeric directive.
> > 
> >               `-' (hyphen) do not pad the field `_' (underscore) pad the field
> >               with spaces
> 
> It is completely undocumented behaviour for strftime(), though. It
> happens to work, but the strftime(3) page mentions nothing about the
> modifier.
> 
> If it is really important that those strings don't have a leading zero
> for locale-specific reasons, shouldn't the original string be %X and %x,
> as appropriate, rather than some tricked out version as is there
> currently?

There is already a bug report about using %X and %x, though I can't
recall the bug# now. Hope the original reporter can stand up.

Abel


> 
> Malcolm
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

-- 
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983   | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)   | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1  41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]