Re: Remove glossary from status page?

[Abel Cheung <deaddog deaddog org>]

On 2003-08-21(Thu) 15:32:50 +0200, Danilo Segan wrote:
> Removing glossary from the "status pages" would be detrimenal to the 
> task -- many will miss it, and therefore, you wouldn't have what to 
> base a new translation on (like, Serbian ;-).

I'm solely discussing about the usefulness of the current glossary.
Is this unmaintained glossary really so useful for people? I have no
very strong opinion on it -- if people prefer to keep it, it's still
fine for me.


> So, if you do care about translations, it should better stay in the 
> status pages.

(to be replied, depending on the replies I receive)


> And the only reason I can see for dropping them is to improve 
> "standings" -- but alas, that's not a reason good enough. And btw, 
> glossary is not included in the core Gnome desktop, so there's nothing 
> in Gnome that makes them translate that (even if they want a "100%" 
> translated Gnome).

Actually I utterly hate that attitude -- translate solely for
translator's personal satisfaction with the 100% status.

To reiterate, I'm solely discussing about the usefulness of the current
glossary.

Abel


> Cheers,
> Danilo
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

-- 
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983   | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)   | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1  41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF

PGP signature