> Since that documentation is currently covered by a rather non-free > license (ie: it has no license and redistributing is not permitted > unless I, the copyright owner, explicitly allows it), I assume I should > at least allow use and distribution under the terms of a more > appropriate license. I got a bit burned by the FDL in the past so, I > welcome input on what users would find more appropriate. I would like > to point out that I will probably request (although not require) > copyright assignments for contributions to this module. I like the licence Elijah uses for its "Developing with GNOME" doc (http://www.gnome.org/~newren/tutorials/developing-with-gnome/html/) though I'd probably add an additionnal clause saying that code samples can be used under a BSD-like licence. Hope that helps, Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=