On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 22:41, Christian Schaller wrote: > On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 21:26, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > <SNIP> > > But if you have a mix of GPL and LGPL code, and it's not separated as > > libraries, automaticly all code is GPL, that's the "problem". The fact > > is that if they are the code owners, it's just that the code they are > > releasing has a dual license, LGPL and GPL. > Which is why the COPYING file in gst-player still contains the GPL > license. Now can we end this meaningless discussion. Um, I'm confused. So you've changed the copyright on most of the code to LGPL, but the whole unit is distributed under the GPL because of the playlist? -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part