Re: Two new projects in the CVS and 5th Toe
- From: "Seth Nickell" <seth gnome org>
- To: "Jim Gettys" <Jim Gettys hp com>, murrayc usa net
- Cc: "Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat com>, "Alexander Larsson" <alexl redhat com>, "Ole Laursen" <olau hardworking dk>, "Gnome Hackers" <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Two new projects in the CVS and 5th Toe
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:04:42 -0700
Is there a problem this is solving? More barriers (to integration /
cross module work / casual fixes) does not seem like something we really
need right now.
-seth
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 1:00PM -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
We've built per-module access rights stuff for handhelds.org. It
allows for easy project creation and delegation of commit privileges
to project leaders.
Right now, however, this needs some rework: our implementation
is not very good, and should be cleaned up before being used
elsewhere (e.g. Gnome).
If someone is interested in a not-huge process to clean this
up so that we can do per-module access rights for gnome, let me know.
- Jim
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 15:16, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:29, Jim Gettys wrote:
> I think Havoc has it right.
>
> We have the machine resources (at least we are in the process of
> getting such resources installed); if it has something to do with
> Gnome, we should be able host it without straining our development
> resources.
Yes, that's all good.
Theoretically (so ignore this) there is the small technical problem
that
we don't have per-module access rights, so this wouldn't allow us to
host stuff for people who we don't know and trust already. And I doubt
that we want the workload of administering per-module access rights.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]