Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Xan Lopez <xan masilla org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:15:25 +1000
<quote who="Xan Lopez">
> El lun, 20-10-2003 a las 03:38, Jeff Waugh escribi?:
> > Good morning all,
> > If you're already in the modules list, you know the drill. :-)
> So, I wonder what should modules depending already on GTK+ HEAD do. Just
> wait without releases until a GTK+ 2.3.0 release is out? If that release
> takes a lot of time we could get into serious troubles, missing several
> phases of the release process.
> We (Epiphany) already depend on a lot of features from GTK+ HEAD, so I
> guess it's too late to go back (or at least an incredible PAIN).
We're basically stuck. I had hoped that aggressive releases were an assumed
part of the GTK+ 2.4 plan , but that doesn't appear to be the case. I
will ask Owen if we can roll some pre-release tarballs, because it is very
important that we get all of this new stuff tested up front.
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
"I think a lot of the basis of the open source movement comes from
procrastinating students." - Andrew Tridgell
] [Thread Prev