Re: New bugzilla keyword - 'screenshot'
- From: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: New bugzilla keyword - 'screenshot'
- Date: 12 May 2002 18:26:27 +0100
> IMHO it would have been useful if there was discussion first and keyword
> addition later.
Yeah, you see that's the point...we've discussed so many things in the
past...and the discussion gets to a point where we [me] just delete
mails/ignore threads...Sometimes it's useful to do stuff now and discuss
later...but whatever, feel free to discuss and when you have some useful
plan for bugzilla let me know.
> Presently most keywords categorise bugs at a level that transcends the
> level of a single module - think of 'keynav', 'i18n', '1.x parity'. there
> are exceptions - 'patch' and 'stacktrace' - the first of which is useful
> and the second which is somewhat useful (with a rapidly decreasing
> usefulness if crasher bugs are rare and have a high priority/urgency).
> Screenshot on the other hand - at least to me - sound like introducing
> 'longdescription' to mark all bug reports with long (20+ lines) of
> description. But possibly i'm missing the whole 'why' part of the
> reasoning...
Um, I disagree...if it helps me to query a bug just that little bit
faster then it *definitely* is useful. I've been using bugzilla a lot
for gnome-utils in the past 3 weeks and have been using the Keyword
field extensively. I am finding that it is becoming the most useful part
of a bugzilla query. So I would like to see some 'discussion' on
creating a list of keywords for use in bugzilla...but I'm not counting
on that discussion happening [1]
See ya,
Glynn :)
[1] I'd quite like to see GNOME 2.0 out before
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]