Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: chabotc xs4all nl
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, otaylor redhat com
- Subject: Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:02:05 +0800
Chris Chabot wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
GTK+-2.0.1 is now available for download at:
[...]
Question, when building the packages for these releases, i noticed the
modules are still stored in
{%_libdir}/gtk-2.0/2.0.0/immodules/
(and the same for loaders)
the 2.0.0 directory made me think that this was related to the version
of the package, however gtk+ 2.0.1 and pango 1.0.1 still store the
immodules & loaders & modules in '2.0.0' and '1.0.0'.
Was this intended? Isnt it related to the version number? Or is this a
'bug' ?
The 2.0.0 in the path is expanded from the GTK_BINARY_AGE variable in
the Makefile, which for gtk x.y.z is defined as:
x.y.(z - interface_age)
Since gtk 2.0.1 didn't add any interfaces (just bug fixes), it has an
interface age of 1 (2.0.0 had an interface age of 0). So it's modules
are in the same directory as 2.0.0's. The same will most likely be true
of all 2.0.x releases of gtk.
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]