Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
 
- To: chabotc xs4all nl
 
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, otaylor redhat com
 
- Subject: Re: GTK+-2.0.1 released
 
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:02:05 +0800
 
Chris Chabot wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
GTK+-2.0.1 is now available for download at:
[...]
Question, when building the packages for these releases, i noticed the 
modules are still stored in
{%_libdir}/gtk-2.0/2.0.0/immodules/
(and the same for loaders)
the 2.0.0 directory made me think that this was related to the version 
of the package, however gtk+ 2.0.1 and pango 1.0.1 still store the 
immodules & loaders & modules in '2.0.0' and '1.0.0'.
Was this intended? Isnt it related to the version number? Or is this a 
'bug' ?
The 2.0.0 in the path is expanded from the GTK_BINARY_AGE variable in 
the Makefile, which for gtk x.y.z is defined as:
 x.y.(z - interface_age)
Since gtk 2.0.1 didn't add any interfaces (just bug fixes), it has an 
interface age of 1 (2.0.0 had an interface age of 0).  So it's modules 
are in the same directory as 2.0.0's.  The same will most likely be true 
of all 2.0.x releases of gtk.
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]