Re: Non-POSIX shells



On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Sander Vesik wrote:

> Solaris users may well have bash installed, but that doesn't help *unless*
> the script actualy asks for bash and doesn't just pretend that it lives in
> a world where everybody has /bin/sh or /usr/bin/sh being bash. The same
> applies if you do s/bash/ksh/ or similar.

so why does Sun ship a non-fully-compliant shell as /bin/sh by default?

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Sex is hereditary -- If your parents never had it, chances are you won't either.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]