Re: TARBALLS DUE: Snapshot, Deep Freeze, But No Release Candidate

[jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 13:01, Owen Taylor wrote:
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 08:55, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 12:21, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >  
> > > > > As of Monday, no code changes should be committed to shipping modules [2]
> > > > > unless directly related to fixing these 9 bugs.
> > > > 
> > > > if this freeze is happening tomorrow, then we need to reach a consensus
> > > > on this quickly.
> > > 
> > > I'd really suggest that it would be better to do the 2.0.1 work on
> > > a branch; it's just a whole lot simpler if you don't have to merge
> > > the "development" branch onto HEAD at some point, and create
> > > a new -2-0 branch.
> > 
> > you mean, do 2.0.0 from HEAD, work on 2.0.1 in a branch, and then merge
> > that up after 2.0.0 comes out?
> 
> No, I mean you make a -2-0 branch now, work on that, make 2.0.0 from that,
> continue working on that branch for 2.0.1.

the problem is we are working on 2.0.1 *now* and not stopping for 2.0.0.

 - jacob