Re: memory allocations.
- From: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann daimi au dk>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Chris Chabot <chabotc reviewboard com>, iain <iain ximian com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: memory allocations.
- Date: 28 Feb 2002 11:52:37 +0100
Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> After that memprof claims gtk_bin_get_child allocates 1012 blocks with
> a range of sizes from 10 to 36, but this is just bullshit and probably
> some sort of bug in memprof's stack tracing. So who knows what these
> blocks really are.
Eazel's sampling profiler, which is based on memprof's code, have also
sometimes given me false results. (I added a
for (i = 0; i < BIGNUMBER; ++i),
and prof told me that some other function was now responsible for 99%
of all time used).
So just as a general warning: be careful with figures from these
programs.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]