Re: GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:21:09 +0100 (BST)
On 10 Apr 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> writes:
> > <quote who="Michael Meeks">
> >
> > > GtkHTML1 GtkHTML2
> > >
> > > editable not editable
> > > actively maintained not maintained
> > > no CSS / DOM CSS / DOM
> > > in-accessible accessible
> >
> > Sounds like the most straight forward solution would be to continue using
> > GtkHTML2 within the GNOME Desktop release components, and port GtkHTML1 for
> > those applications that require editing.
>
> That's certainly the short-term plan, but these widgets involve a lot
> of code, and we really need to pick one of them and push it to feature
> completeness I think.
>
> I guess in the end it doesn't matter what we declare on the mailing
> list - the issue is which one the people doing the work decide to work
> on. Right now Ximian really wants to put effort into GtkHTML1, but it
> sounds like Sun wants to do the accessibility work on GtkHTML2, so
> it's sort of unclear.
>
gtkhtml2 will be in the Sun release - there is no chance of anything else
hapenning given the present timelines - so a certain amount of maintenance
will happen to it. To which level it will be completed as a merit of this
is a biot unclear (other than rendering gnome help docs), but its also the
only acessible html view on the horizon.
The present gtkhtml2 bug list is deceptively short for something
supposedly non-feature complete anyways...
>
> Havoc
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]