Re: GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Luis Villa <louie ximian com> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 12:56, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Michael Meeks">
> > 
> > > GtkHTML1		GtkHTML2
> > > actively maintained	not maintained
> 
> So, in reference to that second column, what should I be doing with
> gtkhtml2 bugs for the 2.0 release? Any thoughts? Is this something that
> should also be getting the proposed/soon-to-be 'this is unmaintained,
> sorry' auto-email treatment?*

I don't think so, I think we need gtkhtml2 to mostly work for 2.0 and
need to fix bugs in it.

Havoc