Re: gtk+-1.2.10 should be in gnome-1.4 (was: Re: Final package deadline for GNOME 1.4)

[Vlad Harchev <hvv hippo ru>]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karl Gaffney wrote:

> 
> 
> If we make this change we're going to need a lot more time to properly
> test that this change doesn't cause any gtk+ related regressions.

 It seems that the changes are pretty localized and can be tested in 10
minutes. Also I'm running current cvs version of gtk and haven't found any
problems with it (and indeed it fixed at problems in gtk-1.2.9).

 I'd recommend trying to cut & paste text with accented characters (in upper
half of iso-8859-1) with gtk-1.2.9 (at least under XLib from XFree86-3.3.x) -
it's very likely that it won't work at all (!) - this means *all* cut & paste
operations will fail for anything but ascii making *all* software unusable!
Cuting and pasting of russian is surely broken -  I didn't test it for
latin1 so I don't know for sure.
 
> -Karl.
> 
> > Delivered-To: gnome-private-members gnome org
> > Delivered-To: gnome-hackers gnome org
> > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:12:52 +0200
> > From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <gnome listserv bat ru>
> > To: Vlad Harchev <hvv hippo ru>
> > Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, 
> gnome-1 4-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org, 
> gnome-1 4-release-team gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org
> > Subject: Re: gtk+-1.2.10 should be in gnome-1.4 (was: Re: Final package 
> deadline for GNOME 1.4)
> > Mail-Followup-To: Timur I. Bakeyev <gnome listserv bat ru>, Vlad Harchev 
> <hvv hippo ru>, gtk-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, 
> gnome-1 4-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org, 
> gnome-1 4-release-team gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
> > X-Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
> > X-Phone: +31 20 535 4444
> > X-Fax: +31 20 535 4445
> > X-WWW: http://www.ripe.net
> > X-BeenThere: gnome-hackers gnome org
> > X-Loop: gnome-hackers gnome org
> > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
> > List-Id: <gnome-hackers.gnome.org>
> > X-BeenThere: gnome-private-members gnome org
> > X-Loop: gnome-private-members gnome org
> > 
> > Owen, I really hope, that this(release of gtk 1.2.10) will happen before
> > Gnome 1.4 release date... 
> > 
> > I don't think that stepping back to 1.2.8 for Gnome is an option, but 
> releasing
> > Gnome with i18n broken 1.2.9 is much worse...
> > 
> > So, please, please - make a release :)
> > 
> > With regards,
> > 	    Timur.
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:57:53PM +0500, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 27 Mar 2001, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Hi, 
> > > 
> > >  I think gtk+-1.2.10 should be officially released before 1.4 deadline. As I
> > > understand, gtk maintainers decided to release it (they even bumped minor
> > > version number to 10 in configure.in) but gave up releasing it for some
> > > reason. See http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gtk%2b/ChangeLog for more info..
> > > 
> > >  I18n in gtk+-1.2.9 is totally broken - it doesn't allow cutting and pasting
> > > any text that contains international characters (true at least for russian,
> > > may be true for iso-8859-1 - didn't check it), and also another couple of 
> i18n
> > > problems. The fixes for these problems are in the CVS for a long time (about 
> 2
> > > weeks).
> > > 
> > >  See the following threads:
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-March/msg00381.html
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-March/msg00379.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  I think gnome-1.4 should contain gtk with all fixes - i.e. gtk+-1.2.10
> > > should be released first, and then included in gnome-1.4.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi everyone, 
> > > > 
> > > > This is a reminder that the final due date for tarballs for GNOME 1.4
> > > > is this Wednesday, Mar 28, at 12:00 Pacific Time.
> > > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-hackers mailing list
> > gnome-hackers gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> > 
> > 
> 

 Best regards,
  -Vlad