Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
 
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
 
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>,	Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>,	Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>,	Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>,	Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, gnome-hackers gnome org
 
- Subject: Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
 
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:59:23 +0100 (BST)
 
On 7 Jul 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM> writes:
> 
> > On 7 Jul 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> > 
> > > > ehhhh... I think making a new module just to "cover up" gross things
> > > > having happened in cvs is not the way to go. IMHO we need to choose
> > > > between:
> > > > 	a) live with the new-* directories, usng cvs delete and repository
> > > > 	   copying to create a consistent source there
> > > > 	b) consolidate the sources to the old directory, using repository
> > > > 	   copy for non-conflicting files and add a suffix (-new, 2,
> > > > 	   whatever) for those that conflict and cvs delete anything that
> > > > 	   isn't needed.
> > > 
> > > I'd vote for b).
> > > 
> > 
> > b) is clearly the Right Thing (TM) to do, except it can be more
> > work-intensive.
> 
> I may have some time to look at it tomorrow.
> 
Except that I just saw that there already is gnome-control-center - I just
wish people were a bit less trigger happy. I still think the maintainers
should be the first line of 'jump in and clean up' for any modules they
are maintainers for, inc. in this case.
> -- 
> Martin Baulig
> martin gnome org (private)
> baulig suse de (work)
> 
	Sander
One day a tortoise will learn to fly
	-- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]