Re: API documentation requirements for next releases
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>
- Cc: desktop-announce-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, GNOME Desktop <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: API documentation requirements for next releases
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:33:33 -0500
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:03 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago we discussed adding a requirement for new APIs that enter
> the core platform [1]: those modules which add new APIs must provide
> documentation for those APIs. Thanks to Murray for bringing it up, and
> for resurrecting the discussion.
>
> The release team has decided that we'll try this plan for the 2.14
> release. If it works out well, we'll use it for subsequent releases as
> well. You can see the details here:
>
> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/NewApiDocs
>
> Summary:
>
> For modules in the core platform [2], we'll require that new APIs and
> other public interfaces have documentation. This includes C functions,
> configuration files, GConf keys, and anything that is not internal only.
>
> 1. Document any new public interfaces since the last stable version
> of the module (e.g. the jump from 2.12.x to 2.14.0). You can do
> this with gtk-doc.
> 2. Mark any newly deprecated interfaces as such.
> 3. Any new module proposed for the platform must be fully
> documented.
Is there a deadline for when this has to be done by? Getting to the
hard freeze and then realizing, "oops not done, but people now depend on
the API" would be a bad thing.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]