Re: subversion on cvs.gnome.org (Re: Putting MonoDevelop into gnome's cvs repo)

[Andy Tai <lichengtai yahoo com>]

Maybe people should also consider GNU Arch
(http://www.gnuarch.org/), which already is at version
1.2 and has more powerful features than Subversion
(distributed repositories, star merging).  GARNOME
uses Arch 
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/2004-March/msg00111.html)


--- Joel Becker <jlbec evilplan org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:28:40AM +0200, Tim Janik
> wrote:
> > hm, what's your experience with subversion so far?
> (stability, scalability,
> > usability, etc.)
> 
> Tim,
> 	Yosh and I have been using Subversion internally at
> work and
> pubically at oss.oracle.com for quite some time now.
>  It's just far more
> pleasant to work with than CVS (IOHO), and aside
> from some version
> change issues (1.0 is out, so that's moot) we really
> haven't had any
> problems.
> 
> Joel
> 
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers