RE: 2.4 Module List - zenity

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> From: Bill Haneman [mailto:bill haneman sun com] 
> There's some circular reasoning going on here that bugs me.
> 
> The question is not whether scripts are useful in general, not
> whether _particular_ scripts are useful, but whether a _general_
> scripting facility is useful.

I think it might be useful to a tiny minority, but not much more than via
any other language binding. I haven't found anything widely-useful on here:
http://g-scripts.sourceforge.net/
that isn't now part of Nautilus.

I'll try to stop ranting now. There's always the chance that there's lots of
GNOME 2.2 users who still feel the need to write Nautilus scripts.

> I don't have an opinion about this particular engine, etc., only
> that the arguments against it seem a little self-referential.

That was intentional. I think that if Nautilus scripts are useful then they
shouldn't be scripts. I was trying to show some of the logical steps along
the way. 

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers