RE: 2.4 Module List - zenity
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: rodrigo gnome-db org
- Cc: glynn foster sun com, gnome-hackers gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: 2.4 Module List - zenity
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:19:34 +0100
> From: Rodrigo Moya [mailto:rodrigo gnome-db org]
> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 13:50, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > > From: Rodrigo Moya [mailto:rodrigo gnome-db org]
> > > and simple users also might want to leatn how to do
> scripts, and use
> > > them for a lot of things (think of a simple UI frontend
> for *every*
> > > command line tool available on the system, or even better, for a
> > > combination of those commands).
> >
> > If such things are actually useful for a lot of users then
> they should be
> > part of the regular Nautilus functionality.
> >
> what do you mean? Have options, as part of the nautilus code, to run
> every possible command line tool available in the system?
I mean.
1. it is not actually useful to run "every possible command line tool".
2. if it's useful to make _some_ extra functionality available then that
should be part of Nautilus.
> That seems a bit overwhelming to me. It would be better IMO to offer a
> set of the most used functionality and allow users to extend that via
> scripts.
Again, if only a small minority of people _need_ to write scripts then
there's no need for xenity to be in the platform. I certainly don't think it
makes sense to include xenity without an example script. And if that example
script is useful then it should not be a script, but should be part of
Nautilus instead.
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]