Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11)
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- Cc: Ricardo Fernández Pascual <ric users sourceforge net>, GNOME Desktop List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, gnome-hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11)
- Date: 25 Mar 2003 15:24:09 +0000
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 05:03, Luis Villa wrote:
...
> Galeon clearly meets most of the standards of GEP 10- as you say, it
> would be a marked improvement over Mozilla in most situations,
> especially as we work to integrate the 'net and the desktop.
FWIW, Moz 1.3+ represents a significant step forward in integration
with GNOME-2. The most recent gtk+-2 builds I've seen have impressive
GTK+, theme, font, and ATK integration, though it's not 100% there yet.
I think Galeon/Epiphany are cool projects and don't intend anything
negative about them, but I do think that the arguments in favor of
having a GNOME-specific browser are less compelling nowadays.
-Bill
--
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]