Re: 524 open PATCH bugs... eek



<quote who="Murray Cumming Comneon com">

> With respect, nobody has bothered because we've always been told that
> there's a completely new site waiting in the wings that will be online a
> week later.

I have *always* maintained that this perspective was lazy, wrong and
unproductive. It makes no sense whatsoever.

> I can't believe that more bug-reports about the current site will help
> much to just make a basic framework of the new site visible as a beta.

Sure, because that makes no logical sense, as they are completely unrelated
issues.

> But yes, a gnome website bugzilla product would be cool.

The product has existed for years. I'm suggesting that we use a new
component or keyword (or version, I guess) to represent current-site bugs,
so they're easy to sort in future.

- Jeff

-- 
Get Informed: SCO vs. IBM                            http://sco.iwethey.org/
 
   "There are men with an appetite for fight and a sense of occasion, and
                  then there is Waugh." - SMH, about Steve
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]