Re: using a macro inside AC_OUTPUT

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

ERDI Gergo wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anyone found a workaround in a GNOME project to using a macro inside
> AC_OUTPUT? The problem is, automake-1.4 is too dumb to properly run the m4
> code in configure.in, and thus doesn't pick up the filenames in AC_OUTPUT
> that would be the result of macros.
>
> For example, in orbitcpp I wrote this:
>
> define(ORBITCPP_TEST_SUBDIRS, [ dnl
> 	test/cpp/testname/$1/Makefile
> 	test/cpp/testname/$1/generated/Makefile
> 	ifelse($#, 1, , [ORBITCPP_TEST_SUBDIRS(builtin(shift, $@))]) dnl
> ])
>
> define(ORBITCPP_TEST, [ dnl
> 	pushdef([testname], $1)
> 	test/cpp/testname/Makefile
> 	ORBITCPP_TEST_SUBDIRS($2) dnl
> 	popdef([testname]) dnl
> ])
>
> but if I want to later use it inside AC_OUTPUT:
>
> AC_OUTPUT(
> 	ORBITCPP_TEST(unions, [atomic_types, struct])
> )
>
> I get an error from automake-1.4:
>
> configure.in: 96: required file `./ORBITCPP_TEST(unions.in' not found
>
> (note that autoconf properly expands the macro)
>
> Has anyone found a workaround for this before?
>  
Try using the AC_CONFIG_FILES() macro.  You can make any number of calls 
to AC_CONFIG_FILES(), so it might serve your purpose.

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers